Lately, I?ve offered two posts about the relationship between `dead spaces? (dead human spirits) and the real `reality? of `time-space?? Specifically, I offered my speculation that the `light? seen by so many at the time of NDE is our SUN - yes, the star 93 million miles away. I speculated that `life after death? may be short-lived ? for most beings/souls ? and that nearly all human consciousnesses end up in the sun. But, that stated, `life? would indeed extend beyond the body and beyond the normal scope of what we consider the time-space of ?real? (at least our abilitiy to interact with it). Additionally, I expressed the view that some `dead spaces? or `ghosts? don?t go to the sun but do remain `alive? on Earth for a limited timeframe. Their `dead space? going on ? which equals - life after death; for at least a few and especially right after death.
My next post related to The Ghosts of Flight 401 ? see below for that post in its entirety, but, in a nutshell ? it appears that `some? `dead spaces? can project their appearance into the `real? reality structure. Evidently. Again, in summary, the dead pilots from the crashed jet were spotted on jets which had their re-cycled parts used from the salvage of the crashed jet. These `dead? pilots claimed outloud to have an `intention? to keep the L-1011?s safe from then onward. The events with the pilots happened multiple times -and multiple times - their `appearance space? vanished in an `instant of time? (an instant of space perhaps) before multiple witnesses - both witnesses that knew them while alive and those that never knew them.
These `appearances? would suggest that `intentionality? can even project into space-time, perhaps for years or even for an indefinite timeframe (until a task is completed)??? and, that one (ghosts) still had intentionality `while dead? ? at least if one (while dead) is hanging around the space of the Earth. And, doesn?t get swept up in the marvels of the universe from a `free space? condition.
But, that brings us to Houdini - and the legend of his `escape? from death - back to the `living?. I have the link on my squidoo site directly ? and it?s under the Great Anomaly Stories Section (easy to find) - at www.squidoo.com/anomalyman or you can copy and paste the link directly ? but ? come right back. Here?s that other site ? same story ? survivalafterdeath.org/articles/ford/houdini.htm remember to put in the www - (I prefer you become familiar with my site anomalyman)
Now that you are familiar with the story-legend ? let me provide the important summary points as I see them. #1 ? `Time? existed (exists) on `the other side?; twice the period it takes to get the `message thru? is noted, each time several months. Additionally, the `dead spaces? (Houdini and his mother) seem to indicate that a few months seems like a long timeframe of effort - then again, that could be my just my read of the words.
Nevertheless, the `dead spaces? (Ghosts) had `time? within which they existed (interestingly, nothing else about their other existance is noted except for the intent of getting this message thru as `proof of survival?. (Could we survive as nothing but intentionalities?)
Now, many folks would go the extra mile to make up proof of survival ? but for Houdini - he was the opposite, a total debunker of the afterlife. If this story is to be accepted as `truth-proof? at least it isn?t from a lifelong proponent of `heaven?. (I will note that no images of heaven seem to be in Houdini?s explanations of the other side either ? just a determination and intentionality of spirit.) Once again, this feeling of sameness exists with the Ghosts of Flight 401 intentionalities surviving for a mission and Houdini?s intentionalities surviving for a mission. Are future intentionalities the link?
Seemingly, the phenomenology of space-time `bends? to provide projection of information (intentions) or, rarely, even `appearances? from `beyond? within the `real? consensus of the moment-to-moment reality. Whether caught on tape (see my squidoo.com March 16th ghost videos) or by the real human naked eye.
It?s also easy to draw this comparison to even `second comings? ? be them a few days after death ? or much later based on actualizing some long promised intentionality (especially helps if one believes? or society believes?) I?ll leave the rest of that speculation for some other time.
There is only one other possible speculation, for me, that provides a real chance that Houdini wasn?t involved (nor his mother) in `getting his double coded message thru? ? and that would be that Arthur Ford ? (as Fletcher) was indeed a mindreader and got the info from Mrs Houdini?s mind. And, while I?m not saying that is the answer ? I?d have to give it at least a real 20% chance if I were to bet on the outcome of that - or 80% - to the chance that Houdini proved to be the `Ultimate Escape Artist Ever - Even Escaping Death?.
http://theheavystuff.com/?p=18
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
