Are Tulpas Everything Esoteric?
It?s only in the last few years that THS has really become aware of Tulpas and the possibility that Tulpas may explain certain types of fortean events. Indeed, once in awhile other blog posts speculate in the same manner. This will be the focus of this Heavy Stuff.
As most readers of THS (The Heavy Stuff) know, this blog supports our Anomalies, ParaNormal, and Mind Perceptions website on Squidoo.com ? and that site has a small daily listing of esoteric(like) links ? similar to great websites like www.thedailygrail.com and www.anomalist.com . Interestingly, this link http://www.binnallofamerica.com/gm1.22.8.html is also written by a woman who has a website of anomalies links like those above (she also has other blogs) and mine ? we share common interests obviously - and it?s of interest that tulpas are one of them. Perhaps, only goofy editors like THS, Leslie, Rick Stokes of anomalist.com and others who run similar sites have an interest in such `esoteric? explanations - but - here is THS?s `take? - once again - on Tulpas.
First, some words to provide a basis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulpa for this discussion.
Tulpas have been associated with Tibetan mysticism - and seem `to be? - thoughtforms ? generated by human consciousness ? and that some of these `created spaces? can take on an extended `life? (time) with intentionality?s. So, again, consciousness, creating a space, that has `time?/duration ? and may - by existing ? produce independent intentionality?s.
Believe it or not, in the pre-hype of the Prophet Yahweh controversy a few years back THS?s writer had direct e-mail exchanges with the Prophet. If you are not familar with P.Y. he claimed that he had been `calling spaceships? into the sky for decades and that he was going to call one to hover in the Las Vegas skies for 45 days straight ? thereby enlightening the world about `flying saucers? and his particular powers to call these ships. P.Y. indeed, had the incredible ability to `call? one of these orbs `on-demand? when interviewed by a local Las Vegas station on live TV ? causing the reporter to be astonished and the gov?t to deny having anything on radar, etc.
What happened, or was shown on TV, was a `light? suddenly being in the sky way way up ? and this `light? started moving rapidly and seemingly independently ? all the while picked up by the video camera and described by the excited reporter. However, because of THS?s interest in Ufo?s, we had already been aware of another gentleman out in California who would `go out daily? and `film ufo?s? ? all he had to do was set up his video camera, wait, and look into the sky and vo-la ? there was a `ufo?. (His `ufo?s? would also last for a few minutes but fade away eventually too. Like P.Y.?s did.) To, THS, these two events seemed totally similar. This THS writer contacted P.Y. ? and told him of the California guy `doing? the same thing ? BUT ? NOT claiming that HE himself was `doing? it ? like P.Y. was claiming.
But, being inquisitive and seeking connections - eventually yielded the information on Tulpas to THS. The revelation was that Tulpas fit exactly what P.Y. was able to `do? ? it seemed that years of prayer had indeed somehow seemed to fuse his consciousness with enough `belief? / `power? - that he indeed was able to project a `conscious space? into existence. The same is true for the guy out filming daily in California ? he built the belief daily too - just like P.Y. ? only he couldn?t fully believe it was a representation of him and his beliefs that it would happen.
Now, to some of Leslie?s points and speculations - and other points too. First, THS agrees that tulpas are mis-identified as `UFO?s? ? after all - both are `lights in the sky?. Both are `light spaces?. Both move in the sky. Not only that, some `lights in the sky? seemingly transform into solid objects. That said, THS?s thinks Tulpas and `lights that turn into UFO?s? are two different phenomena.
First, Tulpas are said to be `independent? once created by a human. Therefore, THS thinks the speculation that folks watching a Tulpa could transform it into a UFO to be misguided. Tulpas simply seem to move, perhaps with intention and last a few minutes. Then disappear. Tulpas, light spaces, do not have the energy to continue indefinitely or transform because of their limited duration. It?s why P.Y. could not put one in the sky for 45 days ? it?s why ? when a Tulpa is observed in the sky ? that it fades eventually, regardless of how many may be observing it. (Point being, energy is not being supplied by human consciousness after formation in THS opinion.)
THS has also pointed out the seeming overlap of Tulpas and Orbs. It seems that orbs are little more than Tulpas NOT in the sky ? but - near the ground. Therefore, Tulpas and Orbs may indeed be the same phenomena ? once again, orbs don?t last indefinitely ? or transform into things (at least not too often, lol). Indeed, they seem very similar. BUT, THS would like to provide another explanation for `balls of light? `balls of light that have space? ? and that is ? Orbs - could be `dead beings?.
THS will say it again; Orbs could be the literal materialization of `beingness? after death. Perhaps the highest state that an enlightened person who dies can archive is `being an Orb?. Literally becoming a `light being? contained within that luminous ball. `Living? somewhere in the virtual particles that constitute most of the reality structure. Perhaps on occasion having the power `to display? or on occasion `displaying? when `called? by folks thinking esoteric thoughts.
But, THS would draw the line on Tulpas molding into some quasi-real object ? such as a UFO without `real gadgets or workings?. That stated Leslie, what a cool concept - worthy of a science fiction storyline.
The Heavy Stuff does not think authorities are finding semi-quasi-real Tulpa objects ? that are not able to be explained. That said, Tulpas, as Leslie stated ? may be behind some things esoteric. Like Ufo sightings and Orb sightings.
Please visit the blogroll sites ? and thanks for making the unique visitor count the highest ever this month @13,000 of you ? thanks again.
http://theheavystuff.com/?p=44









